[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#53981: language-chooser



Michael Sobolev wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 12:10:47AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > We do not expect to have different number of strings.  This is by design.
> > > Look, we have a set of .c files in utilities/dbootstrap directory.  We build
> > > utilities/dbootstrap/po/dbootstrap.pot file (which is the source for C.po)
> > > file.  Now it's easy to update all translations.  Yes, the resulted translation
>            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > may have certain items marked as "fuzzy", and certain items just are not
>     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > translated.  BUT the number of messages is exactly the same.  And all these
>     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > .trm files are generated at once.  I believe we are not going to separately
> > > supply trose .trm files, which simplifies the situation a lot.
> > 
> > From my experience I have to object.  Otherwise my compiled programs
> > shouldn't have segfaulted.  Please count the translations in the .po
> > files.
> 
> Please re-read what I wrote.

I read it.

I don't trust ourselves that much that we don't forget something like updating
everything, thus I want to have some safety mechanism implemented.

> In other words, every time  we update dbootstrap.pot file, all translations
> MUST be updated to have the same number of translations.

Apparently that's not the case at the moment.  So why should we
depend on it?

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
Let's call it an accidental feature.  --Larry Wall


Reply to: