Re: Bug#53563: Retracting original bug, adding new ones with lower severity
Ross Boylan <RossBoylan@stanfordalumni.org> writes:
> Is vfat included in the things fixed in 2.2.4? I thought it was just mv
> and cp.
I don't believe so. Please interact with the kernel maintainer, aka
firstname.lastname@example.org. We do *not* maintain kernel
images. When we have problems with the kernel images, we file bugs on
it just like anyone.
> >Yeah -- that's a kernel issue -- not much we can do....
> Except document it. Several of my concerns centered on knowing exactly
> what types of partitions (e.g., vfat, ntfs) should be readable or writable
> at the different installation stages.
Well -- sure. You could file a wishlist bug for this. It varies by
> I believe the relevant packages are apt and dselect, not the target
> packages that were indicated as broken.
> What I was trying to do was definitely non-standard. If I run through an
> install again I can indicate more precisely what if any problems remain,
> and how to reproduce them. Right now I'd say my report is mostly a
> heads-up that it might be worth testing this area a bit more.
Ok -- good that we CC'd debian-testing then.
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>