On Thu, Dec 23, 1999 at 07:30:32AM -0800, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> Why aren't we using apt's already created, already debugged, already with
> a well defined generic interface, "methods" for ftp, http, etc? Or is
> a slimmed down libstdc++ and libapt-pkg too large for the disks?
Good point. I've considered this, but discarded the idea for now because
I don't want to add C++ to dbootstrap, and for disk-space reasons.
For woody (successor of potato), it's a whole other ballgame.
Cheers,
Marcel
Please send a Cc to me when replying to me on this mailinglist.
Attachment:
pgpdSq9SJTtfh.pgp
Description: PGP signature