Bug#48248: marked as done (bootdisk: As of 25/10/99 resc1440.bin thinks it's Debian 2.2)
Your message dated Tue, 21 Dec 1999 10:07:11 -0500
with message-id <19991221150711.A614C93804@arroz.fake>
and subject line Bug#48248: bootdisk: As of 25/10/99 resc1440.bin thinks it's Debian 2.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Oct 1999 04:02:49 +0000
Received: (qmail 3432 invoked from network); 25 Oct 1999 04:02:48 -0000
Received: from daniel6.lnk.telstra.net (HELO jam.danpat.net) (mail@139.130.53.136)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 25 Oct 1999 04:02:48 -0000
Received: from toast.danpat.net [203.43.125.34]
by jam.danpat.net with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 11fbLH-0008Mc-00; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 14:02:43 +1000
Received: from danpat by toast.danpat.net with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
id 11ffD0-00004r-00; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 18:10:26 +1000
From: Daniel Patterson <danpat@danpat.net>
Subject: bootdisk: As of 25/10/99 resc1440.bin thinks it's Debian 2.2
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.6
Message-Id: <E11ffD0-00004r-00@toast.danpat.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 18:10:26 +1000
Package: bootdisk
Version: 19991025
Severity: wishlist
rsion information on the current rescue disk is wrong in the stable
archive. On booting it says "Welcome to Debian 2.2" when it should
read 2.1
-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux toast 2.2.12 #2 Thu Sep 9 23:39:26 EST 1999 i586 unknown
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 48248-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Dec 1999 14:36:42 +0000
Received: (qmail 18095 invoked from network); 21 Dec 1999 14:36:40 -0000
Received: from 209-122-228-95.s349.tnt2.nyw.ny.dialup.rcn.com (HELO arroz.fake) (@209.122.228.95)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 21 Dec 1999 14:36:40 -0000
Received: by arroz.fake (Postfix, from userid 421)
id A614C93804; Tue, 21 Dec 1999 10:07:11 -0500 (EST)
To: Daniel Patterson <danpat@danpat.net>
Cc: 48248-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#48248: bootdisk: As of 25/10/99 resc1440.bin thinks it's Debian 2.2
From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
In-reply-to: <19991221110143.A13274@danpat.net>
References: <oa4sdeh5xy.fsf@frijole.fake> <19991221110143.A13274@danpat.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Daniel Patterson <danpat@danpat.net>
message dated "Tue, 21 Dec 1999 11:01:43 +1100."
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 10:07:11 -0500
Sender: apharris@burrito.onshore.com
Message-Id: <19991221150711.A614C93804@arroz.fake>
>On Sun, Dec 19, 1999 at 06:22:17PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>> I don't understand this bug report.
>>
>> Were you using the boot-floppies from unstable? If so, it's quite
>> correct that it's Debian 2.2, not 2.1. If you were using the one from
>> stable, then I can't reproduce your problem.
>This was a hwile ago. It seems that the dists/disks-i386 directory in
>stable was symlinked to unstable for some reason. All the australian
>mirrors I tried at the time had the same thing, the stable disks-i386
>directory was a copy of the unstable one. Very wierd, but it was fixed in
>a couple of days.
Ah! I know exactly what you're talking about now.
Yeah -- i wish ftp admins didn't create links when there is no
unstable boot-floppies yet. I'll ask them not to.
Since this problem has been fixed, I'm closing this report.
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: