Re: 2.2 kernel "flavors" needed for i386 -- any list?
Lalo Martins <lalo@webcom.com> writes:
> ``Need'', no. But sound would be cool. Perhaps I'm starting to
> sound repetitive, but the fact that you have to compile a
> kernel to get sound on Debian is really really bad.
That's absolutely not true. My x86 laptop works great with sound --
they are all modules.
> Someday in the future we all know we're going to use a
> modularized solution like RH but nobody ever implemented it. So
> just including the most common stuff as modules will do.
This has been discussed in depth already. We're just not ready for
initrd dynamic module loading for mounting root yet.
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: