Re: liloconfig replacment (was Re: GRUB)
On Sat, Sep 18, 1999 at 08:09:54PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Lalo Martins <lalo@webcom.com> writes:
>
> > The RedHat script is _good_, very good. But IMVHO GRUB is the
> > correct sollution, because:
> >
> > 1: easier interface for multiboot (you don't have to type the
> > name of the kernel, yuck)
> >
> > 2: 1024 cyl and LBA, this is a major pain.
>
> I'm quite sure we're not going to go with grub in potato.
No prob, but, why not? As a teacher I surely know that the
1024cyl problem is going to become a show-stopper very soon.
> Can someone look at Slackware and/or RedHat lilo configuration systems
> with an eye to integrating them with the boot floppies?
Will do. The one in RH has that ugly UI like Xconfigurator, but
does the job very nicely.
[]s,
|alo
+----
--
I am Lalo of deB-org. You will be freed.
Resistance is futile.
http://www.webcom.com/lalo mailto:lalo@webcom.com
pgp key in the web page
Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org
Reply to: