Bug#41193: boot-floppies: README does not mention the need for dosfstools to be installed

To: <shaleh@varesearch.com>
Cc: 41193@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#41193: boot-floppies: README does not mention the need for dosfstools to be installed
From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Date: 21 Jul 1999 00:44:40 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] oa7lnuvcg7.fsf@burrito.fake>
Reply-to: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>, 41193@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <shaleh@varesearch.com>'s message of "Mon, 12 Jul 1999 16:46:13 -0700"
References: <[🔎] E113pm1-000236-00@crashtest.su.varesearch.com>

<shaleh@varesearch.com> writes:

> As the subject says, the README does not say that I need to install
> dosfstools, only that I need a kernel with msdos support.

Hmm... dosfstools is needed to install?  We could add this to the
top-level 'make check' rule (i386 only) pretty easily I think.

--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#41193: boot-floppies: README does not mention the need for dosfstools to be installed
  - From: <shaleh@varesearch.com>

Prev by Date: Re: "live" fs (Re: Strategy for boot-floppies)
Next by Date: Re: Ignoring dependance on "important" packages?
Previous by thread: Bug#41193: boot-floppies: README does not mention the need for dosfstools to be installed
Next by thread: debiandoc2html problems
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread