Re: Ignoring dependance on "important" packages?
On Monday 19 July 1999, at 21 h 52, the keyboard of "Martin Bialasinski"
<martin@internet-treff.uni-koeln.de> wrote:
> The sizes can only be acurate for profiles anyway, not for multiple
> selected tasks.
Yes, it is even documented :-)
> What do you thing about a mandatory "basic" task package that has a
> dependancy on all important packages?
A general problem with 'tasks and profiles as regular packages' is the deletion. Once packages have been pulled in by a dependency on task-something, there is no way to suppress them (but one by one). The problem is really complicated and not addressed at the present time.
Reply to: