Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 08:40:30PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > I don't get it. Why not release a proper 2.0.36-4 or 2.0.36-3.1 even
> > to stable just like any other package?
> >
> > The way the tecra images are released is basically, "not really
> > released at all".
> Because I do not want this image to be the officla one.
Um, ok. Well, can you explain why not? AFAIK, you just made the WD
SCSI driver a module rather than in the kernel -- I'd be willing to
sacrifice WD users for aic7xxx users (since aic must outnumbers wd by
10 to 1 or so).
What would it take to get this released? Do you need more testing of?
Does Enrique have this kernel? Should I pester him to build a version
of boot-floppies with this kernel for testing?
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to:
- References:
- bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
- From: "A. P. Harris" <apharris@queso.onshore.com>
- Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
- From: Aaron Van Couwenberghe <vanco@sonic.net>
- Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
- From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
- Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
- From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
- Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>