Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 08:40:30PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> I don't get it. Why not release a proper 2.0.36-4 or 2.0.36-3.1 even
> to stable just like any other package?
>
> The way the tecra images are released is basically, "not really
> released at all".
Because I do not want this image to be the officla one.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Reply to:
- References:
- bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
- From: "A. P. Harris" <apharris@queso.onshore.com>
- Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
- From: Aaron Van Couwenberghe <vanco@sonic.net>
- Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
- From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
- Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
- From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>