Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
>On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 07:48:37PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>>
>> I don't believe this is the correct diagnosis. Last I heard, I think,
>> the less used WD40 card should be unloaded from the kernel and made
>> into a driver in order to fix the problems. Herbert Xu mentioned he
>> was going to release a 2.0.36-4 which had this fix.
>
>I think you misunderstood me there. I've already released a kernel-image
>without the WD driver, and I intended that someone would use this just like
>the tecra image.
I don't get it. Why not release a proper 2.0.36-4 or 2.0.36-3.1 even
to stable just like any other package?
The way the tecra images are released is basically, "not really
released at all".
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to:
- References:
- bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
- From: "A. P. Harris" <apharris@queso.onshore.com>
- Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
- From: Aaron Van Couwenberghe <vanco@sonic.net>
- Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
- From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
- Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Prev by Date:
Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
- Next by Date:
Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
- Previous by thread:
Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
- Next by thread:
Re: bootable, rootable, base, and the rest
- Index(es):