On Wed, Jun 30, 1999 at 05:08:35PM -0500, matthew.r.pavlovich.1 wrote: > What about SMP systems? Shouldn't we have a separate package for SMP? > ie, smp kernel, modified utils for smp. Yes. SMP does not belong onto a bootdisk. What utils do you need to modify for smp? > Are we gonna see a public NFS server that we could use to host the base > install? It would be pretty slick if you could just walk around the > office with one boot disk and a fat connection to setup a box. If you have a office you probably have a server there that could host an archive with most packages needed for install. But yes, this is how it works here. It works even better with a bootable CD instead of a floppy. Boots *much* faster. Nils -- Plug-and-Play is really nice, unfortunately it only works 50% of the time. To be specific the "Plug" almost always works. --unknown source
Attachment:
pgpL_cFOU4I_j.pgp
Description: PGP signature