Bug#33430: marked as done (boot-floppies: asclock conflicts with afterstep in slink)
Your message dated Fri, 21 May 1999 01:05:25 +0200
with message-id <19990521010525.Z24537@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 1999 23:07:37 +0000
Received: (qmail 21818 invoked from network); 15 Feb 1999 23:07:26 -0000
Received: from simula.efis.ucr.ac.cr (root@163.178.110.101)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 1999 23:07:26 -0000
Received: from pollux.efis.ucr.ac.cr (mmagallo@pollux.efis.ucr.ac.cr [163.178.110.75])
by simula.efis.ucr.ac.cr (8.9.2/8.9.2/Debian/GNU) with SMTP id RAA23583;
Mon, 15 Feb 1999 17:16:28 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <199902152316.RAA23583@simula.efis.ucr.ac.cr>
Received: by pollux.efis.ucr.ac.cr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 15 Feb 1999 17:06:26 -0600
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 17:06:26 -0600
From: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <mmagallo@efis.ucr.ac.cr>
Subject: boot-floppies: asclock conflicts with afterstep in slink
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.7
Package: boot-floppies
Version: N/A
Severity: grave
I got this from a user:
> This package [asclock] states
> Conflicts: wmaker (<< 0.15.0), afterstep (<= 1.4.5.3-1)
> yet the version of afterstep provided with slink is 1.4.5.3-1.
The conflict is there because hamm's wmaker used to provide asclock. Right
after releasing hamm I wrote the afterstep maintainer asking him to remove
asclock from afterstep and IIRC we reached an agreement on that issue.
> Note that both asclock and afterstep are part of the Work_std
> configuration, i.e. a standard workstation, and thus generate a conflict
> message during initial installation.
This is the reason for this bug report. Please feel free to reassing this
bug to afterstep. I rather see asclock removed from the Work_std
configuration.
Thanks,
Marcelo
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.1
Kernel Version: Linux pollux 2.2.0 #2 Tue Feb 2 16:56:24 CST 1999 i586 unknown
Reply to: