Re: debian 2.1r3 needed and release team coordination
>>>>> "Adam" == Adam Di Carlo <email@example.com> writes:
Adam> IMHO, we should be thinking about Debian 2.1r3. This is
Adam> what I think needs to be in Debian 2.1r3 and why we need it:
Adam> * replace kernel-source 2.2.1 pkg with 2.2.5 or better
Adam> Rationale: 2.2.1 is very evil
I got a 2.2.5-ac3 kernel package ready at
This kernel also have the /proc/.config patch applied, which I
think would be good if we include in ALL of our future kernels.
We are GNU. You will be GPL'ed. Resistance is futile.
/ \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ Turbo Fredriksson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
( D | e | b | i | a | n ) Debian Certified Linux Developer
\_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ Gothenburg/Sweden
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
fissionable SEAL Team 6 Honduras [Hello to all my fans in domestic
surveillance] Ft. Bragg Ortega class struggle Mossad colonel nuclear
PLO radar BATF Saddam Hussein jihad