Re: 2.1.7 commits not yet committed?
On Thu, Feb 11, 1999 at 11:41:25AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Feb 1999 08:29:02 +0000, Enrique Zanardi <ezanardi@ull.es> said:
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 1999 at 02:06:56AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> >> Enrique, it appears to me that you haven't committed your changes
> >> for 2.1.7 yet. It would help me at least if you committed these...
>
> > You're right, the changes I've made since last monday haven't been
> > commited yet. I'm doing that right now.
>
> Argh! You're not fully committed. You ignored my documentation
> changelog stuff in debian/changes and you didn't tag the CVS sources.
> Right now, AFAIK, the CVS source tree and what you used to build are
> still not in sync.
That's what ones get when dealing with a link that drops 60% IP packets
from 8:00 AM to 21:00 PM (and one is going on holydays that night).
I guess I could use an account on the UK as sort of a proxy (Spain-UK
links are fine, and I've heard UK-US links are really wide). An account on
a machine hooked to lonman.net.uk would be a dream, but netcom.net.uk
would be OK too. Any offers?
Hopefully that mess is fixes now (except the tag) and I won't repeat it
for 2.1.8. BTW, I'll start building/testing 2.1.8 tomorrow. I won't
upload the floppies set until the sources are commited, tagged and properly
announced.
Thanks,
--
Enrique Zanardi ezanardi@ull.es
Reply to: