[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#29851: marked as done (rescue disk asks for rootdisk, complains about bad root filesystem)



Your message dated Sun, 10 Jan 1999 17:42:41 +0000
with message-id <19990110174240.A16677@molec3.dfis.ull.es>
and subject line Fixed in boot-floppies_2.1.4
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Nov 1998 19:43:35 +0000
Received: (qmail 11307 invoked from network); 22 Nov 1998 19:43:34 -0000
Received: from pfaffben.user.msu.edu (root@35.10.20.81)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 22 Nov 1998 19:43:34 -0000
Received: by pfaffben.user.msu.edu
	via sendmail from stdin
	id <m0zhfQ9-000R8dC@pfaffben.user.msu.edu> (Debian Smail3.2.0.102)
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 22 Nov 1998 14:43:45 -0500 (EST) 
Message-Id: <m0zhfQ9-000R8dC@pfaffben.user.msu.edu>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 14:43:45 -0500 (EST)
From: pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu (Ben Pfaff)
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: rescue disk asks for rootdisk, complains about bad root filesystem
Reply-to: pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu
Bcc:

Package: boot-floppies
Version: 2.1.0

When I booted to resc1743.bin, SYSLINUX merely reported `boot failed'
and gave up.

When I booted to resc1743-safe.bin, the Linux kernel started
successfully, but then it asked me to insert a rootdisk even though
root.bin was on the disk.  When I downloaded, wrote, and inserted a
rootdisk, then pressed Enter, it started up dinstall, but then
dinstall just reported that it `had trouble finding the root
filesystem' or similar and the system rebooted.

I think something's wrong here...


Reply to: