[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#22473: marked as done (pcmcia problem with boot floppies)



Your message dated 09 Jan 1999 00:49:15 -0500
with message-id <oazp7typ0k.fsf@burrito.fake>
and subject line bugs closed in previous versions of boot-floppies
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 1998 04:53:06 +0000
Received: (qmail 1340 invoked from network); 15 May 1998 04:53:05 -0000
Received: from ts-3-ip12.kc.sky.net (HELO microdog) (root@209.90.4.204)
  by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 15 May 1998 04:53:05 -0000
Received: by microdog
	id m0yaCU3-000WWPC
	(Debian Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #2); Thu, 14 May 1998 23:52:39 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <m0yaCU3-000WWPC@microdog>
Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 23:52:39 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mike Coleman <mkc@sky.net>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: pcmcia problem with boot floppies
Bcc:

Package: boot-floppies
Version: unknown

More on that fresh install on a laptop:

- The PCMCIA alternative is kind of confusing.  For example, my laptop has
  only one slot, which is occupied by the floppy during installation, so it's
  not clear whether it's safe to configure it or not.  (It turned out that the
  answer to this is 'yes').

- I think I chose not to configure the network part, and
  /etc/pcmcia/network.opts ended up as an empty file.  It would be extremely
  useful if the distribution template were included there (commented out
  maybe), rather than just an empty file.

I was using the boot floppies in "frozen" (the tecra versions), in the 4-26
directory.  The actual files seem to have been last touched on 5-11.

--Mike


Reply to: