[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#25003: marked as done (Installing Debian 2.0 fails with massive libc5-libc6 conflicts.)



Your message dated Mon, 21 Dec 1998 15:13:33 +0000
with message-id <E0zs71Z-0000sy-00@molec3.dfis.ull.es>
and subject line Fixed in boot-floppies_2.1.3
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jul 1998 02:07:35 +0000
Received: (qmail 23466 invoked from network); 25 Jul 1998 02:07:34 -0000
Received: from pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (HELO MIT.EDU) (18.69.0.28)
  by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 25 Jul 1998 02:07:34 -0000
Received: from VELUM.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA04734; Fri, 24 Jul 98 22:07:54 EDT
Received: from localhost by velum; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/29May96-0631PM)
	id AA11957; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 22:07:32 -0400
Sender: seth@velum.mit.edu
Message-Id: <35B93DE4.41C6@speech.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 22:07:32 -0400
From: Seth Hall <seth@speech.MIT.EDU>
Organization: Speech Communications Group - MIT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (X11; I; OSF1 V3.2 alpha)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Cc: seth@speech.MIT.EDU
Subject: Installing Debian 2.0 fails with massive libc5-libc6 conflicts.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

	I may be missing something, but a *very simple* initial
installation of Debian 2.0 seems to always break after the 'base'
system installs correctly and installation script invokes dselect
to install any one of many 'pre-selected' package sets. I am not
able to install ANY of these 'pre-selected' packages without
running into massive conflicts between libc5_5.4.33-6.deb and the
previously (automatically) installed libc6 (vers 2.0.7t-1). I assume
that the 'base2_0' package contained libc6. I have tried the Admin,
Standard, etc., etc. preselected sets, all to no effect.

	I have looked at the bug reports, mail archives, etc, and see nothing
about this. It seems like I must be missing something awfully simple
and/or obvious, but I can't see what :-(

	Can you help, or point me toa source that can?

				Thanks very much,
						   Seth Hall	
						   Systems Manager
						   Speech Comm. Group
						   MIT-RLE


Reply to: