Re: My progress on armhf: xf86-video-msm for armhf attempt. Please test.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:23:18AM +0100, Tixy wrote:
>On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 23:34 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>> My changes were to remove -mfpu=softfp and -mthumb-interworking, since
>> as far as I can tell armhf uses -mfpu=hardfp and -mno-thumbinterworking
>> by default.
>Is that true? For ARMv7, interworking is essentially free and Thumb code
>would likely be faster due to its smaller memory footprint. So I would
>have thought that not only should Thumb code be catered for, but
>actively encouraged. Or am I missing something?
You're correct - we should be using Thumb as much as we can!
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. firstname.lastname@example.org
"Since phone messaging became popular, the young generation has lost the
ability to read or write anything that is longer than one hundred and sixty
characters." -- Ignatios Souvatzis