Re: XFS is unsafe (Was: Re: d-i does not show jfs in partition tool)

To: Xan <dxpublica@telefonica.net>
Cc: debian-arm <debian-arm@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: XFS is unsafe (Was: Re: d-i does not show jfs in partition tool)
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 19:56:45 +0300
Message-id: <20080906165645.GG23673@deprecation.cyrius.com>
In-reply-to: <48B413DC.7010207@telefonica.net>
References: <1219424223.11725.11.camel@moria> <48AED93D.6090404@telefonica.net> <1219426136.11725.15.camel@moria> <48AEE71D.8010801@telefonica.net> <1219431354.11725.32.camel@moria> <48B29148.2010508@telefonica.net> <1219665772.4826.5.camel@moria> <48B2C6F0.6010106@telefonica.net> <1219739246.1559.33.camel@moria> <48B413DC.7010207@telefonica.net>

* Xan <dxpublica@telefonica.net> [2008-08-26 16:31]:
> So, it seems that jfs is good. Perhaps you (Martin) could include in
> d-i as an option.

I'm uploading new installer kernels for armel right now that contain
JFS.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: XFS is unsafe (Was: Re: d-i does not show jfs in partition tool)
  - From: Xan <dxpublica@telefonica.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Please test daily debian-installer images
Next by Date: Armel upgrade question
Previous by thread: Re: [Ecls-list] ECL sigill on debian armel (lenny)
Next by thread: Re: XFS is unsafe (Was: Re: d-i does not show jfs in partition tool)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread