Re: Security buildd for armel
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 07:39:50PM +0000, Martin Guy wrote:
> 2008/2/8, Daniel Jacobowitz <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 06:48:18PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > So, these Intel boards are _badly_ needed. Or maybe the buildd
> > > can be run in qemu on a fast amd64 machine, I don't know if
> > > that would work out.
> > It would probably be slower than the existing buildd.
> It would. you lose about a factor of 12 in (32-bit) AMD MHz to ARM
> MHz, and that's when it's running in a straight line; "configur"ing is
> slower yet.
> If it's just a question of money I don't mind buying the security team
> an N2100, but mine is giving segfaults and bus errors on long builds
> so you might like to consider something different.
toffee, the current security buildd is already a "Thecus N2100" (I
don't know if there are different models with varying speeds).