Re: Some thoughts on the ARM build daemons
David Fokkema a écrit :
> On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 15:37 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Lennert Buytenhek a écrit :
>>> If you never fix machines when they break, having 7 machines is better
>>> than having 2 machines, because if you lose 1 out of 2 machines you lose
>>> half of your build capacity, whereas if you lose 1 out of 7 machines,
>>> it's not a really big deal.
>> FYI, we currently have lost 4 out of 7 machines...
> Obviously, I don't know anything about this and am not involved in any
> way. But this sounds serious. Recent talk about the current status of
> the arm port (oldabi, eabi) unsettles me. I only run it on a personal
> slug, but still... I like debian!
Those build daemons are up, but not building any package, because of a
too old kernel.
The kernel has been upgraded on one of them one month ago, it needs to
Two of them have been upgraded two days ago (nobody contacted the local
admin before). They needs to be restarted.
The local admin needs to be contacted for the fourth one, but I have no
idea how to contact him.
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' firstname.lastname@example.org | email@example.com
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net