Re: Is armel project alive?
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 06:46:44PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > > Good stuff. Which instruction set are you building for? v4t?
> > The Debian armel gcc patch that I produced switches the default from
> > v5 back to to v4t. I assume he's using that, so yes, that would be
> > v4t (with interworking.)
> Correct. OTOH I havent tested it on a armv4t machine, but if is
> really important, I expect someone to complain eventually that it
> doesn't work ;)
One of the platforms I tested the original package collection on was
Cirrus Logic ep93xx, which is armv4t, and that seemed to work fine.