Peter Naulls wrote:
In message 45FB6758.firstname.lastname@example.org"><45FB6758.email@example.com> Bill Gatliff <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Guys: Does anyone have an assessment of gcj for armel? Is it just around the corner, or is it horribly broken and looking to stay that way for a while?Want to give us a run down of its issues? I _might_ be able to look at it, but it will be some weeks off. I'm presently fighting IXP networking issues under both LE Debians.
Well, to put it succinctly:
# apt-get install gcj
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
gcj: Depends: gij (>= 4:4.1.1-13) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: gcj-4.1 (>= 4.1.1-2) but it is not installable
E: Broken packages
My repository is:
deb http://armel-debs.applieddata.net/debian sid main
-- Bill Gatliff email@example.com