On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 04:09 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Sep 8, 2004, "Peter O'Gorman" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > > I could revert this patch, but it would not do what you want. As you > > can see it was already pass_all on all linux variants before this > > patch, it just didn't look like it. > > Err... I don't see ARM in the pass_all list, for one. And, come to > think of it, FR-V isn't either, and you definitely don't want it > there. AM33/2.0 isn't either, and it shouldn't. > And meanwhile in the real world, a mind-bogglingly huge number of things won't build on ARM if this isn't set to pass_all. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Description: This is a digitally signed message part