On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 19:47, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > I'm wondering what's up with this bug. The libc6-dev released with > woody (-6) was fine, as is the new woody version (-10). But the first > unstable release (-7) was bad (see subject above, or the bug), and the > latest unstable is too (-13). I don't see any problem with -13 in unstable. Are you sure that one is broken? p.