Re: 2.2.25 tagged and building (was Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?)

To: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org, debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: 2.2.25 tagged and building (was Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?)
From: Philip Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 08:40:36 +0100
Message-id: <E158Gsm-0001md-00@kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org>
In-reply-to: Message from Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com> of "07 Jun 2001 11:20:13 EDT." <oazobkb9le.fsf_-_@arroz.fake>
References: <oa1ypwcvla.fsf@arroz.fake> <E14yLCh-0007xe-00@kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org> <oag0eb86ua.fsf@arroz.fake> <20010604123855.D24396@cistron.nl> <oa8zj7lr74.fsf@arroz.fake> <20010606002817.C27690@cistron.nl> <20010606144741.I26589@cistron.nl> <oazobkb9le.fsf_-_@arroz.fake>

>Ok, building 2.2.25 for i386 and source upload now.

Great.  I've started ARM builds of 2.2.25 and 2.3.5.

p.

Attachment: pgpTfbnjn5cGI.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Re: Samba dog slog
Next by Date: dpkg-cross arm update
Previous by thread: Re: Samba dog slog
Next by thread: dpkg-cross arm update
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread