Re: updated ARM hall of shame
Previously Philip Blundell wrote:
> It's not a dead link: it's telling the truth. xfonts-bolkhov doesn't appear
> in the quinn-diff output (probably because it isn't built for *any*
> architectures) and the autobuilder has never heard of it.
So why is it in a `hall of shame' then? It sounds like the maintainer
isn't doing anything wrong here.
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |