Re: Sub-architectures in update-modules
> > EBSA285 -> ?
> > Rebel-Netwinder -> netwinder
> > Chalice-CATS -> ?
> I'm pretty sure "netwinder" is good for all three of these. Other than that,
> sounds fine. Most of the other platforms aren't suitable for standard Debian
> installs anyway, being weirdo embedded-type targets, so I reckon covering just
> the Footbridge and Acorn platforms is going to be enough.
Hmm, I run a complete potato on my shark. But I must admit that I don´t know
exactly what this here means and if the shark would need somthing of its own
or share with some other architecture. I will have a deeper look when I find
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com