[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#215826: apache: does not send index.* files (per DirectoryIndex)



Hi Dave,
	i cannot reproduce this problem so i need to check your
configuration files. Can you kindly mail them to me?? Of course feel free
to strip any sensible data but try to keep it as more complete as
possible.

Thanks
Fabio

On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, David M. Dowdle wrote:

> Package: apache
> Version: 1.3.28-4
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> newest version does not listen to DirectoryIndex index.html index.shtml
> (in srm.conf)
>
> it only shows the directory contents (by dir_module )
>
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
> Architecture: i386
> Kernel: Linux clouded 2.4.21 #1 SMP Wed Jul 2 00:00:57 PDT 2003 i686
> Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
>
> Versions of packages apache depends on:
> ii  apache-common                 1.3.28-4   Support files for all Apache webse
> ii  debconf                       1.3.15     Debian configuration management sy
> ii  dpkg                          1.10.15    Package maintenance system for Deb
> ii  libc6                         2.3.2-8    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
> ii  libdb4.1                      4.1.25-9   Berkeley v4.1 Database Libraries [
> ii  libexpat1                     1.95.6-6   XML parsing C library - runtime li
> ii  libmagic1                     4.04-1     File type determination library us
> ii  logrotate                     3.6.5-2    Log rotation utility
> ii  mime-support                  3.23-1     MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
> ii  perl [perl5]                  5.8.1-2    Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
>
> -- debconf information:
>   apache/server-name: www.leopard.net
>   apache/server-admin: root@leopard.net
>   apache/init: true
>   apache/document-root: /var/www
> * apache/enable-suexec: true
>   apache/server-port: 80
>
>
>
>

-- 
Our mission: make IPv6 the default IP protocol
"We are on a mission from God" - Elwood Blues

http://www.itojun.org/paper/itojun-nanog-200210-ipv6isp/mgp00004.html



Reply to: