Re: 32-bit memory limits IN DETAIL (Was: perspectives on 32 bit vs 64 bit)

To: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: 32-bit memory limits IN DETAIL (Was: perspectives on 32 bit vs 64 bit)
From: Sylvain Sauvage <Sylvain.Sauvage@metanoesis.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 21:02:25 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20051103210225.180fa28d@culdesac.eriador.me>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 436A21D6.4050500@aitel.hist.no>
References: <20051025003140.9969.qmail@science.horizon.com> <200510251901.07742.martinkuball@web.de> <[🔎] 436A21D6.4050500@aitel.hist.no>

Jeudi 3 novembre 2005, 15:42:30 CET, Helge Hafting a écrit :
>[...] 
>  Nobody is anywhere near this limit yet. 
> 
> Helge Hafting

Sure, 640kB^W 16EB ought to be enough. ;o)

-- 
Sylvain Sauvage

Reply to:

References:
- Re: 32-bit memory limits IN DETAIL (Was: perspectives on 32 bit vs 64 bit)
  - From: Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no>

Prev by Date: Re: nvidia (graphics) driver pain
Next by Date: Re: nvidia (graphics) driver pain
Previous by thread: Re: 32-bit memory limits IN DETAIL (Was: perspectives on 32 bit vs 64 bit)
Next by thread: USBs stop working
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread