Re: Bug#314988: Still a problem?

[Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:33:40AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 13:58 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:59:34PM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:55:25PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
> > > > I did a  build-deps and and dpkg-buildpackage to make sure that I had all the 
> > > > build depens, but it seems as Ted said and I confirm that I needs the  
> > > > nvidia-glx-dev.
> > > The Question is: why the package needs nvidia-glx-dev on amd64 and on other
> > > platforms it builds succesfully without nvidia-glx-dev?

> > Because of a longstanding bug in the nvidia lib package which creates a
> > broken .so symlink when it's installed without nvidia-glx-dev as well.

> Is this the same issue as in 272438?

Yes, that's the same bug.

> So should this be reassigned to nvidia-glx-dev?

Uh, the build issue doesn't seem to have much to do with the reason for this
bug report.

- -- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDZtvdKN6ufymYLloRAkL+AJ9XxSh2Pd5qRESx+/gRD98huTEyyQCgqzSq
0naitiNPEL10yjWAVOMUZhY=
=9INz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----