Re: Status of project
yack... it looks weird to me...
I just add /lib64 and /usr/lib64 to /etc/ld.so.conf and did ldconfig so
it grabbed libraries from that directories and ld itself is clever
enough to distinguish between 32 and 64 bit version...
at least this is my vision
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:20:44PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> > Another thing that is special is that we don't need build all packages
> > for 64 bit at first, because 32 bit packages are supposed to work
> > just as well.
> I don't know anything about the library linking mechanism, is this
> /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 --> ../lib64/ld-2.3.2.so
> link sufficient for 64bit-binaries not to use /lib/libc.so.6 but /lib64
> libc.so.6 ?
> >From IRIX-SGI I know that they have LD_LIBRARY32_PATH and LD_LIBRARY64_PATH,
> so this is not needed?
> PS: Within the next weeks we will get some Athlon64 and Opteron systems, for
> easy integration into our cluster, they will primarily run based on our
> woody/testing system, but I plan to have a 64bit chroot-environment.
> Perhaps I can help to recompile some packages for debian-amd64?
> PS: I resend this, since I don't see it in the list yet (after more than
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com
=------------------------------ /v\ ----------------------------=
Keep in touch // \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192
Linux User ^^-^^ 
GPG fingerprint 3BB6 E124 0643 A615 6F00 6854 8D11 4563 75C0 24C8