On Mon, Jan 04, 1999 at 10:56:41PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > The {pre,post}{inst,rm} should definitely be non-interactive. I don't think so. They should not directly query the user but instead use a layer in between. > > This also won't address dpkg asking if it may overwrite a conffile. > > Interesting point. The problem here is that you can't really set this > centrally for a cluster since each machine that uses the central > configuration might have different config-files. I'm not sure what to do > about that.. Just install the new file either as <name>.dpkg-new or alternatively reserve a directory /var/lib/config for new config files and register them in a simple database. This does not take care of incompatible config-files. We need an extension of the control file to take care of this. > > This requires a "master" workstation to do a sample install, so that a > > proper expect script can be generated. > > I don't see that, we have dependencies to prevent that. I don't see the point at all :) cu Torsten
Attachment:
pgpLIbyjhn6f2.pgp
Description: PGP signature