Re: dpkg modification: non-interactivity
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Mitch Blevins wrote:
> > I just think we can accomodate the needs of the multi-machine clusterer's
> > without adding alot of complexity to the tools used by everyone else.
>
> But making a filesystem appear to change while in reality it doesn't
> is not the solutition here. I still think the only way to do this
> properly is make the maintainer scripts check this.
I trust your judgement on this, and won't push it.
I just cringe at the thought of more requirements for new maintainer
scripts.
(check a config option before modifying any file)
-Mitch
Reply to: