Re: ColdFire was Re: [buildd] Etch?
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Aur�en G��E wrote:
> > This was in reference to your statement about the nonexisting perfomance
> > hit.
> What I meant is it is better to have less performance on CF instead
> to have less performance on legacy m68k. The emulation would only
> take place on CF kernels, not on legacy m68k kernels.
Ok, sorry, I misread this part, but this would mean much less perfomance
for CF, as the differences from 68020 to CF can be quite large.
A dedicated CF port would IMO make more sense, if that one is working, the
m68k port would automatically benefit from it as well.