Re: Please requeue cernlib for stable-proposed-updates?
Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Kevin McCarty wrote:
>>Could someone please requeue cernlib for stable-proposed-updates ...
> It died a rather horrible death on top of the OOM error (if that's what
> happened) - I got eth0: receive buffer exhausted in a tight loop and the
> box basically sat idle since Friday.
> I've added cernlib to no_auto_build locally. Before retrying it on hobbes
> (to stress test the new 512 MB SDRAM DIMM) I'll need to set up a chroot
> for stable-security there. That'll take a while.
OK, thank you! (Cool, I didn't know you could put 512 MB on a 68k
machine.) No hurry --- it _is_ stable-proposed-updates, after all (the
upload is to remove non-free stuff, not security related).
Kevin B. McCarty <firstname.lastname@example.org> Physics Department
WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/ Princeton University
GPG: public key ID 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544