Re: (object ()()) vs (long ()())

To: Richard.Zidlicky@stud.informatik.uni-erlangen.de
Cc: camm@enhanced.com, debian-m68k@lists.debian.org, wouter@debian.org, gcl-devel@gnu.org, linux-m68k@phil.uni-sb.de
Subject: Re: (object (*)()) vs (long (*)())
From: Peter Barada <pbarada@mail.wm.sps.mot.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:19:34 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 200207311819.g6VIJYZ03834@hyper.wm.sps.mot.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020731134441.B12885@linux-m68k.org> (message from Richard Zidlicky on Wed, 31 Jul 2002 13:44:41 +0200)
References: <[🔎] E17Zb0j-00084T-00@intech19.enhanced.com> <[🔎] 20020731134441.B12885@linux-m68k.org>

>Function return values must be declared (and used) properly on m68k, 
>pointer values are returned in reg a0, ints d0. I would be surprised
>if m68k was the only arch that gets broken by this..

Which OS support his ABI? I'd like to know so I can be sure that my
ColdFire v4/v4e changes produce correct code for the variants. 

-- 
Peter Barada                                   Peter.Barada@motorola.com
Wizard                                         781-852-2768 (direct)
WaveMark Solutions(wholly owned by Motorola)   781-270-0193 (fax)

Reply to:

References:
- (object (*)()) vs (long (*)())
  - From: Camm Maguire <camm@enhanced.com>
- Re: (object (*)()) vs (long (*)())
  - From: Richard Zidlicky <Richard.Zidlicky@stud.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>

Prev by Date: Re: (object (*)()) vs (long (*)())
Next by Date: Re: (object (*)()) vs (long (*)())
Previous by thread: Re: (object (*)()) vs (long (*)())
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: (object (*)()) vs (long (*)())

Re: (object ()()) vs (long ()())