debian-policy Dec 1997 by thread

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Re: Policy about packages that have Tk dependent parts. Christian Schwarz
Re: not a first amendment question Brian White
final bo-updates naming scheme Hamish Moffatt
- Re: final bo-updates naming scheme Christian Schwarz
crontab Joey Hess
- Re: crontab Oliver Elphick
  - Re: crontab James Troup
- Re: crontab Mark Baker
  - Re: crontab Brian White
    - Re: crontab Philip Hands
Re: FHS and filesystem mount points (!) Brian White
Re: Changelog files Juan Cespedes
- Re: Changelog files Hamish Moffatt
  - Re: Changelog files Remco Blaakmeer
policy for translated manpages for section 1 ? Yann Dirson
- Message not available
  - Re: policy for translated manpages for section 1 ? Yann Dirson
    - RFC: policy for translated docs (was Re: policy for translated manpages for section 1 ?) Enrique Zanardi
Re: bash should not be essential Kai Henningsen
Re: Policy Weekly Issue #4/3: Guidelines for Motif applications Guy Maor
Re: Policy Weekly Issue #4/1: Bash vs Bourne shell Guy Maor
Re: Policy Weekly Issue #4/6: Secure maintainer scripts Guy Maor
Re: proposed minimum function of /etc/init.d scripts Guy Maor
- Re: proposed minimum function of /etc/init.d scripts Steve Greenland
  - Re: proposed minimum function of /etc/init.d scripts Philip Hands
- Re: proposed minimum function of /etc/init.d scripts Christian Schwarz
Re: Backspace and delete Ian Jackson
- Re: Backspace and delete Christian Schwarz
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Backspace and delete Ian Jackson
  - Re: Backspace and delete Juan Cespedes
  - Re: Backspace and delete Mark W. Eichin
    - Re: Backspace and delete Guy Maor
    - Re: Backspace and delete Santiago Vila Doncel
    - Re: Backspace and delete Enrique Zanardi
    - Re: Backspace and delete Christian Schwarz
    - Re: Backspace and delete Hamish Moffatt
- Re: Backspace and delete Ian Jackson
- Re: Backspace and delete bruce
  - Re: Backspace and delete Christian Schwarz
LZW compression -- source code non-free? Ben Gertzfield
- Re: LZW compression -- source code non-free? Joey Hess
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: LZW compression -- source code non-free? bruce
What about the texi/html policy-project ? Yann Dirson
- Re: What about the texi/html policy-project ? Santiago Vila Doncel
  - Re: What about the texi/html policy-project ? Yann Dirson
    - Re: What about the texi/html policy-project ? Christian Schwarz
    - Re: What about the texi/html policy-project ? Yann Dirson
Do we want /usr/libexec ? Christian Schwarz
- Re: Do we want /usr/libexec ? Nicolás Lichtmaier
  - Re: Do we want /usr/libexec ? Christian Schwarz
    - Re: Do we want /usr/libexec ? Guy Maor
liblockdev ready for policy? Christian Schwarz
- Re: liblockdev ready for policy? Fabrizio Polacco
RFC2119 David Frey
Moving topics from debian-private (was Re: SPI money out) Tyson Dowd
- Re: Moving topics from debian-private (was Re: SPI money out) Gonzalo A. Diethelm
Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? Christian Schwarz
- Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? Manoj Srivastava
  - Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? Radu Duta
    - Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? Manoj Srivastava
    - Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? Radu Duta
    - Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? Manoj Srivastava
    - Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? Milan Zamazal
    - Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? James Troup
    - Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? Scott Ellis
    - Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? Joel Klecker
    - Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? Mark W. Eichin
    - Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? Manoj Srivastava
    - Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? Mark W. Eichin
    - Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? Hamish Moffatt
    - Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? David Frey
    - Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? Hamish Moffatt
    - Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? Christian Schwarz
    - Free software replacements for PGP and SSH (was: Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages?) Joel Klecker
    - Re: Free software replacements for PGP and SSH (was: Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages?) Hamish Moffatt
    - Re: Free software replacements for PGP and SSH (was: Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages?) Joel Klecker
    - Re: Free software replacements for PGP and SSH (was: Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages?) Topi Miettinen
    - free PGP (Was: Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages?) Kai Henningsen
    - Re: free PGP (Was: Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages?) David Frey
    - Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? James Troup
    - Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? Joost Kooij
    - Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? Mark W. Eichin
    - another use of md5sums Radu Duta
    - Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? Manoj Srivastava
    - Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? Fabrizio Polacco
    - Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages? Manoj Srivastava
  - MD5SUMs in debs / dpkg install hook (new thought) Radu Duta
    - Re: MD5SUMs in debs / dpkg install hook (new thought) Hamish Moffatt
    - md5 on the fly or md5 in deb, RIPEMD-160 vs MD5 Radu Duta
    - Re: MD5SUMs in debs / dpkg install hook (new thought) Manoj Srivastava
    - Re: MD5SUMs in debs / dpkg install hook (new thought) Kai Henningsen
Re: Taking over production of emacs20 package. Adam P. Harris
- Re: Taking over production of emacs20 package. Sten Anderson
  - Re: Taking over production of emacs20 package. Rob Browning
- Re: Taking over production of emacs20 package. Rob Browning
- Re: Taking over production of emacs20 package. Raul Miller
[Q] who has authority to mess w/ package bugs? Adam P. Harris
- Re: [Q] who has authority to mess w/ package bugs? Scott Ellis
- Re: [Q] who has authority to mess w/ package bugs? Mark W. Eichin
  - Re: [Q] who has authority to mess w/ package bugs? Guy Maor
Policy for group ownership of games (Was: Re: Bug#15846: rocks-n-diamonds: errors on startup) Joost Kooij
- Re: Policy for group ownership of games (Was: Re: Bug#15846: rocks-n-diamonds: errors on startup) Guy Maor
  - Re: Policy for group ownership of games (Was: Re: Bug#15846: rocks-n-diamonds: errors on startup) Joost Kooij
    - Re: Policy for group ownership of games (Was: Re: Bug#15846: rocks-n-diamonds: errors on startup) Guy Maor
Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? Santiago Vila
- Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? Scott Ellis
  - Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? Adrian Bridgett
    - Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? Scott K. Ellis
    - Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? Santiago Vila
    - Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? Scott K. Ellis
    - Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? Santiago Vila
    - Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? Scott K. Ellis
    - Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? Philip Hands
    - Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? Karl M. Hegbloom
    - Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? David Frey
    - Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? Guy Maor
- Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? Kai Henningsen
  - Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? Santiago Vila
    - Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? Scott K. Ellis
    - Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? Karl M. Hegbloom
    - Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? Hamish Moffatt
    - Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? Kai Henningsen
    - Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? Santiago Vila
    - Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? Christian Schwarz
    - Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? Christian Schwarz
- Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? Marco d'Itri
- Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles? Nicolás Lichtmaier
policy on g appended to lib names Fabrizio Polacco
- Re: policy on g appended to lib names Guy Maor
Bug#16199: Missing rationale for /etc/init.d scripts being conffiles. Santiago Vila
Re: ldconfig warnings Adam P. Harris
- Re: ldconfig warnings Rob Browning
  - Re: ldconfig warnings Kai Henningsen
    - Re: ldconfig warnings Adam P. Harris
    - Re: ldconfig warnings Kai Henningsen
    - Re: ldconfig warnings Joey Hess
    - Re: ldconfig warnings David Engel
    - Re: ldconfig warnings Joey Hess
Re: IconPath, menu Adam P. Harris
- Re: IconPath, menu Marcelo E. Magallón
  - Re: IconPath, menu Adam P. Harris
Policy about use of upstream source as .orig.tar.gz Gregor Hoffleit
- Re: Policy about use of upstream source as .orig.tar.gz Ben Gertzfield
  - Re: Policy about use of upstream source as .orig.tar.gz Will Lowe
    - Re: Policy about use of upstream source as .orig.tar.gz Guy Maor
    - Re: Policy about use of upstream source as .orig.tar.gz Will Lowe
-O3 compilation? John Goerzen
- Re: -O3 compilation? Anthony Fok
- Re: -O3 compilation? James Troup

The last update was on 07:47 GMT Sat Mar 08. There are 148 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc