Re: wodim floating point exception
Andy Polyakov <email@example.com> wrote:
> I fail to understand point with these rants. Why do you undertake role
These are not rants. I referred to a real problem as Sun is _very_
careful about license issues, Sun asked for a permission to distribute growisofs.
At the same time (May 2006 IIRC), I ave been informed that Sun started to
distribute cdrtools including DVD support.
Because Sun is very careful about license issues, Sun e.g. stopped distributing
libcdio in Auhust 2007 (Sun's Lawyers discovered that libcdio, being an official
FSF project, is in conflict with the GPL).
BTW: In a few weeks we will have a portable and legal replacement for libcdio
in Solaris for playing audio CDs that works by calling a pipe to
> Anyway, the above quoted note openly admits that original note was
> poorly formulated and clarification was provided. I take blame for poor
> formulation, but [once again] assure that no changes in licensing terms
> took place at alleged time [or any other time]. Sun indeed contacted
> Inserve (not me!) and I've got a note about the fact and that Inserve
> proceeded as agreed. Sun did wonder if notice can be removed from my
> page, but I left the decision to Inserve. Apparently clarification
> sufficed. A.
>From a legal view, you previously added further limitations to the rules from
the GPL. These further limitations have been removed IIRC in Autumn 2006.
EMail:firstname.lastname@example.org (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
email@example.com (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily