Re: remove the pointless delay
>From: Volker Kuhlmann <email@example.com>
>Me too. The delay is good some of the time, simply annoying at other
>> Unless it has been removed, there should be an option for
>> Read the docs..
>Not a good answer. Using gracetime=0 still enforces a minimum of two
>seconds. The docs don't mention this fact (is that a bug by omission?).
>Any chance of a change Jörg? When I say 0, then generally I mean 0, not
It is definitely not the first time that I answer this question:
- The crive needs far more than 2 seconds to initialze.
- 2 seconds is far less than 1% of the total time.
- If the time is reduced, cdrecord will no longer work
properly with respect to all supported funtionality.
EMail:firstname.lastname@example.org (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
email@example.com (uni) If you don't have iso-8859-1
firstname.lastname@example.org (work) chars I am J"org Schilling
URL: http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/usr/schilling ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily