[SECURITY] [DSA 2770-1] torque security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2770-1 security@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/ Salvatore Bonaccorso
October 09, 2013 http://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : torque
Vulnerability : authentication bypass
Problem type : remote
Debian-specific: no
CVE ID : CVE-2013-4319
Debian Bug : 722306
John Fitzpatrick of MWR InfoSecurity discovered an authentication bypass
vulnerability in torque, a PBS-derived batch processing queueing system.
The torque authentication model revolves around the use of privileged
ports. If a request is not made from a privileged port then it is
assumed not to be trusted or authenticated. It was found that pbs_mom
does not perform a check to ensure that connections are established
from a privileged port.
A user who can run jobs or login to a node running pbs_server or pbs_mom
can exploit this vulnerability to remotely execute code as root on the
cluster by submitting a command directly to a pbs_mom daemon
to queue and run a job.
For the oldstable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
version 2.4.8+dfsg-9squeeze2.
For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
version 2.4.16+dfsg-1+deb7u1.
For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem will be fixed soon.
We recommend that you upgrade your torque packages.
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)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=0S9S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: