Re: Regarding gitlab
- To: debian-ruby@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Regarding gitlab
- From: Per Andersson <avtobiff@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 18:13:28 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] CABYrXSRRP1zgd3Ar80UzhoOWqkyM4uEU=GsJ1GWc_ADdboizuw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <20130123222200.GA8818@spin>
- References: <20130111123700.GA31972@debian.org> <20130116092656.GA21644@royal> <20130116172147.GA24676@entropy.proba.jussieu.fr> <20130120123451.GA5408@royal> <20130120140625.GA26755@debian.org> <20130120150118.GA1107@royal> <CABYrXSRX3KQSiYUwnvVPN0V--bBwQezoiQtzcp9E3ueYqYsabA@mail.gmail.com> <20130120222644.GA3680@royal> <20130120233531.GA15631@spin> <20130123144040.GA13582@debian.org> <20130123222200.GA8818@spin>
Reviving the GitLab packaging effort!
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Cédric Boutillier
<cedric.boutillier@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:40:40AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>
> Thanks Antonio for this cleaned Gemfile.
> I extracted from it the names of the gems, and generated a new graph
>
> http://people.debian.org/~boutil/gitlab/gitlab_deps20130123.pdf
>
> which looks (a bit) less intimidating than the previous one.
>
> The legend is still the same:
>> > green is in Debian
>> > yellow is waiting in NEW
>> > orange is ITP
>> > purple is RFP
Could we generate a new graph and see what is missing and left to do?
Best,
Per
Reply to: