Re: Regarding gitlab
Hi!
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Cédric Boutillier
<cedric.boutillier@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Antonio for this cleaned Gemfile.
> I extracted from it the names of the gems, and generated a new graph
>
> http://people.debian.org/~boutil/gitlab/gitlab_deps20130123.pdf
Neat, great work!
The gem rubyntlm is a false positive, it is already packaged as ruby-ntlm.
> which looks (a bit) less intimidating than the previous one.
Indeed. :-)
What are typical developer gems that are not a requirement for running
tests?
So far Antonio has flagged pry and guard. Any other common gems that
can
--
Per
Reply to: