Bug#714634: lsb-core: Remove lsb-invalid-mta as a dependency of lsb-core; require an actual MTA instead
Package: lsb-core
Version: 4.1+Debian8+deb7u1
Severity: important
Hi,
This bug report is a continuation of the following thread:
http://debian.2.n7.nabble.com/Questions-regarding-lsb-invalid-mta-td2980123.html
To summarize, lsb-invalid-mta does not fulfil the requirements of the LSB
specification, and as such should not be installed as a dependency of
lsb-core. Rather, an actual MTA should be installed, and the lsb-invalid-mta
package preferably removed from the Debian repositories altogether (as I understand
this was a downstream initiative, and does not appear to be appropriate
in Debain). For example, lsb-core could instead depend on "default-mta | mail-transport-agent".
Regards,
Aaron
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.1
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages lsb-core depends on:
ii alien 8.87
ii at 3.1.13-2
ii bc 1.06.95-2+b1
ii binutils 2.22-8
ii bsd-mailx [mailx] 8.1.2-0.20111106cvs-1
ii bsdmainutils 9.0.3
ii bsdutils 1:2.20.1-5.3
ii cpio 2.11+dfsg-0.1
ii cron [cron-daemon] 3.0pl1-124
ii cups-bsd [lpr] 1.5.3-5
ii cups-client 1.5.3-5
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.49
ii ed 1.6-2
ii exim4-daemon-light [mail-transport-agent] 4.80-7
ii file 5.11-2
ii lib32z1 1:1.2.7.dfsg-13
ii libc6 2.13-38
ii libc6-dev [libc-dev] 2.13-38
ii libc6-i386 2.13-38
ii libncurses5 5.9-10
ii libpam0g 1.1.3-7.1
ii locales 2.13-38
ii lsb-base 4.1+Debian8+deb7u1
ii lsb-release 4.1+Debian8+deb7u1
ii lsb-security 4.1+Debian8+deb7u1
ii m4 1.4.16-3
ii make 3.81-8.2
ii man-db 2.6.2-1
ii mawk 1.3.3-17
ii ncurses-term 5.9-10
ii passwd 1:4.1.5.1-1
ii patch 2.6.1-3
ii pax 1:20120606-2
ii procps 1:3.3.3-3
ii psmisc 22.19-1+deb7u1
ii python 2.7.3-4
ii rsync 3.0.9-4
ii time 1.7-24
ii zlib1g [libz1] 1:1.2.7.dfsg-13
lsb-core recommends no packages.
lsb-core suggests no packages.
-- debconf information excluded
Reply to: