Re: Epson Perfection 1240U USB scanner device not found
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:31:08PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> Hi Debianologists,
>
> This scanner is supposed to be fully supported by SANE.
>
> When I plug it in, dmesg shows:
>
> [460008.108261] usb 1-1.2: new full-speed USB device number 26 using ehci_hcd
> [460008.202148] usb 1-1.2: New USB device found, idVendor=04b8, idProduct=010b
> [460008.202155] usb 1-1.2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0
> [460008.202159] usb 1-1.2: Product: Perfection1240
> [460008.202163] usb 1-1.2: Manufacturer: EPSON
>
> lsusb returns:
>
> Bus 001 Device 026: ID 04b8:010b Seiko Epson Corp. Perfection 1240
>
> But scanimage --list-devices only show my notebook camera.
> The notebook is a Lenovo T410. My kernel is recent 3.2 stock kernel.
>
> Any ideas what to try?
Here are all the sane packages I've installed.
I guess that I am missing the correct backend.
Or possibly, udev is not creating the USB device.
ii libksane-data 4:4.8.4-1 scanner library (data files)
ii libsane 1.0.22-7.3 API library for scanners
ii libsane-common 1.0.22-7.3 API library for scanners -- documentation and support files
ii libsane-extras 1.0.22.2 API library for scanners -- extra backends
ii libsane-extras-common 1.0.22.2 API library for scanners -- documentation and support files
ii libsane-hpaio 3.12.2-1 HP SANE backend for multi-function peripherals
ii libwine-sane 1.0.1-3.5 Windows API implementation - scanner module
ii sane 1.0.14-9 scanner graphical frontends
ii sane-utils 1.0.22-7.3 API library for scanners -- utilities
ii xsane 0.998-3+b1 featureful graphical frontend for SANE (Scanner Access Now Easy)
ii xsane-common 0.998-3 featureful graphical frontend for SANE (Scanner Access Now Easy)
> thanks,
>
> Joel
>
> --
> Joel Roth
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 20120720033108.GA13154@sprite">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20120720033108.GA13154@sprite
>
--
Joel Roth
Reply to: