Re: Problem updating debian 6
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 08:52:49AM +0200, David Seira wrote:
> 2012/5/23 Chris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz>:
> > What does "ls -al /var/lib/apt/lists/" show now?
> >
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 31488757 may 18 00:56
> ftp.es.debian.org_debian_dists_squeeze_main_binary-amd64_Packages
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1964287 may 18 00:56
> -rw-r----- 1 root root 0 abr 17 11:12 lock
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 may 24 07:33 partial
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1261300 may 17 23:58
> security.debian.org_dists_squeeze_updates_main_binary-amd64_Packages
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 309643 may 17 23:58
> security.debian.org_dists_squeeze_updates_main_source_Sources
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 86939 may 17 23:58
> security.debian.org_dists_squeeze_updates_Release
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 836 may 17 23:58
> security.debian.org_dists_squeeze_updates_Release.gpg
It seems to have repopulated the directory, despite the messages that it
failed to download the files. Ahh, see the date on the partial
directory? What's under there. Maybe delete those and try again?
> > Can you spare another server for testing purposes?
> >
>
> No. As I told you before, this is the only server with strange behaviour.
You could use it for comparison purposes.
Also:
apt-get update -o Debug::Acquire::http=true 2> http.log
might shed some light on whats happening.
You could try that on a good server and see what the differences are.
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
Reply to: