Bug#572839: [Fwd: Bug#572839: transition: graphviz]
On 10 March 2010 at 01:22, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
| Christoph Egger <christoph@debian.org> writes:
| > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 05:05:47PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >> On 9 March 2010 at 21:33, David Claughton wrote:
| >> | That would be the latest 2.26.3 version. It's in experimental now,
| >> | unfortunately I overlooked that ggobi doesn't compile against it (as it
| >> | stands), or I would have contacted you sooner.
| >> |
| >> | I can confirm that ggobi with the patch removed compiles and appears to
| >> | work against the new graphviz (based on a quick random test I just did
| >> | at any rate :-)
| >> |
| >> | Do you have time to look into updating ggobi over the next few days?
| >> | Ideally I'd like to go ahead with uploading the new graphviz to unstable
| >> | as I've just been given the go-ahead by the release team for the
| >> | transition, but is that going to be a problem for you?
| >>
| >> I think I can re-build ggobi pretty much within hours given a new graphviz.
| >> But my pbuilder does only look at unstable -- so can you upload? I would
| >> follow quickly so that ggobi would not be a blocker.
| > graphviz should now already sit in incoming (provided I didn't
| > mess up uploading again).
|
| Yep, it's in the archive now. I have scheduled the needed binNMUs.
I am not seeing it yet in unstable.
Dirk
--
Registration is open for the 2nd International conference R / Finance 2010
See http://www.RinFinance.com for details, and see you in Chicago in April!
Reply to: