Re: systemd
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 12:20 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
[snip]
> Without any objective evidence, who knows?
[snip]
> Which of those is best suited to being the default?
You want that daemons you need are killed, even when there should be no
replacements for the daemons? IIUC this is what systemd does. Too funny
since pulse can't be simply killed by the user. Somebody tries to teach
us, what we need and what not.
On Arch I'm not using systemd, but there already seem to be dependencies
to some libsystemd thingy etc..
Regards,
Ralf
Reply to:
- References:
- systemd
- From: "Ralf Mardorf" <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net>
- Re: systemd
- From: Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com>
- Re: systemd
- From: Tom H <tomh0665@gmail.com>
- Re: systemd
- From: Roger Leigh <rleigh@codelibre.net>