Re: [Nbd] Almost ready for release?
- To: Alex Bligh <alex@...872...>
- Cc: "nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net" <nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net>
- Subject: Re: [Nbd] Almost ready for release?
- From: Wouter Verhelst <w@...112...>
- Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 23:58:58 +0100
- Message-id: <20161109225858.cjffp53z2xujvl5k@...3...>
- In-reply-to: <3A48FB44-D2DF-4EF1-9EE7-0EC6BE5066D3@...872...>
- References: <20161108233905.xpcfbpfaj4iat6b6@...3...> <3A48FB44-D2DF-4EF1-9EE7-0EC6BE5066D3@...872...>
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 12:22:19PM +0000, Alex Bligh wrote:
>
> > On 8 Nov 2016, at 23:39, Wouter Verhelst <w@...112...> wrote:
> >
> > The STARTTLS implementation in nbd-server is almost ready. Still TODO:
> >
> > - Interoperability testing against qemu (yes, yes, I said I'd do that
> > earlier, but hey)
> > - Client certificate validation
> > - Enforcing TLS1.2 by default
> > - Allowing versions of GnuTLS older than 3.3
>
> In the current build, if you compile with an old version of GnuTLS (I am
> fixing compatibility with old versions now), ./configure says:
>
> checking for GnuTLS... no
>
> which is fine, but still tries to compile with GnuTLS, but not link to it.
> Compilation fails.
This had everything to do with pecurialities of shell syntaxis. Fixed now.
--
< ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen
people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules,
and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too.
-- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12
Reply to: